Hm. There is legal precedent (not that SCOTUS cares anymore) in Perry v US. SCOTUS opinion then?
“Congress is WITHOUT power to abrogate the obligations of the United States in an attempt to lessen government expenditures.” There ye have it.
And this isn’t even a “who is equal” or “what is privacy” challenge. It’s in the Constitution.
Perry as you know is the only Supreme Court decision to examine Sect 4 - it does have some good language in it that helps Biden.
undefined subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)
Skip for now
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.
Hm. There is legal precedent (not that SCOTUS cares anymore) in Perry v US. SCOTUS opinion then?
“Congress is WITHOUT power to abrogate the obligations of the United States in an attempt to lessen government expenditures.” There ye have it.
And this isn’t even a “who is equal” or “what is privacy” challenge. It’s in the Constitution.
Perry as you know is the only Supreme Court decision to examine Sect 4 - it does have some good language in it that helps Biden.