67 Comments

It would be the best move for the conservative majority SCOTUS to rule against Trump in this case. They’ve faced serious legitimacy issues in last years and siding with Trump won’t help them.

Expand full comment

I would like to think that SCOTUS isn't worried about optics, that they are only concerned with the law...yeah, I'm a dreamer.

Expand full comment
Dec 26, 2023Liked by Dean Obeidallah

Great article, Dean

Expand full comment
author

Thanks Donna!!

Expand full comment

Read you everyday!!

Expand full comment

This is an excellent summary of how this particular Supreme Court might rule, and I so much want you to be right!

Expand full comment
Dec 26, 2023Liked by Dean Obeidallah

Dean I hope you are right! Thanks for lifting my mood today!

Expand full comment
author

Chris- It's not really a prediction but the reason for a potential outcome not being discussed. But it is possible!!

Expand full comment

We can hope! And you’re right, if they think this through they should realize if Fake Bone Spurs is elected they’re toast.

Expand full comment

Dump and Jack Smith have presented Roberts and the Leo/McConnell Cabal with an opportunity at redemption. By ruling that Dump is not immune, and by ruling that Dump is an insurrectionist and barred from office, this partisan, hopelessly corrupt Court could quickly regain its integrity in the eyes of the American people. No one would care about Harlan Crowe or other corrupting billionaires. No one would care about Ginni Thomas. A grateful nation would breathe a collective sigh of relief.

Expand full comment

Oh, I still “care” about Ginni!

Expand full comment

I should, but since she is never going to be prosecuted, I no longer can.

Expand full comment

I read many times during the J6 hearings that Liz Cheney bargained with Nancy Pelosi that she would go after Trump, but in exchange, she wanted hands off her bff Ginni Thomas. As they say, the wheels of justice turn slowly, but I do believe Ginni (& hopefully Clarence) will be made to answer for their corruption & J6 participation sooner if not later.

Expand full comment

Ginni and Clarence are part of the DC Insider Protection Club. The Club will see to it that they are never held to account. Because if the curtain falls on them, many many others could be taken out as well. Frankly it's why Garland isn't letting Jack Smith go after members of Congress who we know were in on the plot. If he takes out Scott Perry for example, Perry will make sure he doesn't go down alone. And there will be a wealth of dirt uncovered on more than a few Democrats as well.

Expand full comment

That needs to happen!! Regardless of party, flush the corruption out. Do the crime, do the time.

Expand full comment
Dec 27, 2023Liked by Dean Obeidallah

There is no happy ending for anyone should he win, but especially the only branch of government that CAN overrule him. No future for them if they don’t squash his candidacy.

Expand full comment

There is no universe in the multiverse where this SCOTUS votes to keep Trump off the ballot under the 14th amendment. There will be no legal deus ex machina to save us. Even if he’s convicted in one of his criminal cases before the election, he will be able to drag the appeals process beyond it. Absent the Orange il Doche choking out on a Quarterpounder, voting for Biden is the only thing that will keep the black shirts out of the White House. So suck it up buttercups and cast your fucking votes.

Expand full comment

This is absolutely correct. All the rest is a distraction. SCOTUS will narrowly rule against CO. Smith is doing his best, but SCOTUS is slow-walking the 1/6 case, and Cannon has put the documents case in a deep freeze. The current federal judiciary is full of corrupt GOP partisans that were raised in FedSoc nurseries. They will never rule in favor of Democrats. It’s not in their DNA.

Expand full comment

Er...Brown Shirts.

Expand full comment

Er...Brown Shirts.

Expand full comment

A recent Seth Abramson stack documented that Plan B on January 6, if the “tourists” had met stout resistance at the Capitol was to march on the Supreme Court building with the idea of pressuring the Court to order the vote certification halted, notwithstanding the fact that few, if any, of the Justices would have been there at the time.

The current Justices have to know that their only means of self preservation under a second Trump term would be anticipatory obedience (to borrow Timothy Snyder’s term) to Trump’s desires in their rulings. One undesired ruling could be their last.

Expand full comment

What, and they lose their Gravy Trains for life? No Way!

Expand full comment

Well, Dean -- you have allowed your views show a new low taste in commentary. Never have I ever seen the members of the Supreme Court called Human Beings before. I grant that some may be, but to make such a sweeping generalization seems irresponsible. Shukra!

Expand full comment

😂😂😂

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

Expand full comment

This is a very persuasive argument! Plus there sure has been a tide of accountability this year and I can only hope for more next year! Must keep up hope!

Expand full comment

You're assuming they don't want to be his synchophants. Only 3 justices would not line up behind Der Fuhrur and they don't matter to the Federalist Society's disciples.

Expand full comment

I agree with your reasoning. And Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is short, clear, simple and direct. And not only all that, but also this: Recent national polls are showing Haley with a 17 point lead over Biden, while Trump has only a 4 point lead over Biden. Therefore, the SCOTUS GOP justices would help the GOP's presidential chances by upholding the Colorado Supreme Court's ruling. It would be a win for our nation and the GOP would even get a boost in the 2024 presidential election. PS - I am not a Republican. But I would consider such a ruling to be favorable (and legally correct).

Expand full comment

I only glance at Polls this far out...

Expand full comment

Exactly, the Trump cult is absolutely throwing this election for Republicans. While Trump could win a 2020 rematch against Biden, Haley seems to have a much better chance at victory. It’s just pathetic to hoist up a losing candidate.

Expand full comment

Your argument rests entirely on the assumptions that 5 out of 9 of SCOTUS judges would ever oppose Trump's agenda, and that they do what they do based on a commitment to an independent judiciary and not simply to enact an explicitly conservative political project.

These assumptions are at odds with the reality that 6 of these judges have politics that strongly align with Trump's, and are clearly disinterested in any judicial framework other than seizing power.

I suggest you listen to a few episodes of the 5-4 podcast.

Expand full comment

What is the 5-4 podcast?

Expand full comment

https://www.fivefourpod.com/

A podcast about the Supreme Court and why it sucks.

Expand full comment

Thanks, I'll check it out.

Expand full comment

And shouldn’t it help their decision process that 2 Federalist Society legal scholars have already written a paper stating that the 14th amendment article 3 UNAMBIGUOUSLY disqualifies Trump! Happy world without him on the ballot! 😁

Expand full comment

Wonderful encouraging analysis of this legal question.

Expand full comment

Excellent read, but probably not gonna happen.

Expand full comment